Was there more weight? Shop for Marker Ski Bindings at REI - FREE SHIPPING With $50 minimum purchase. Take care! Ski it as hard as you want, there’s absolutely no reason to worry about the binding not supporting aggressive skiing, big airs, and cliff drops. The New Duke Pro EPF 18 vs. the Old Duke EPF 16. Not so keen on mounting the PTs off the mid sole mark. The difference here is you actually flip the whole toe piece forward to reveal the pins underneath. More Info... $75.00. Chairlift Chat is the official blog of Skiessentials.com. Now the toe piece works just like an alpine toe with all of its advantages! MARKER bindings are equipped with a moveable AFD (anti friction device) supporting a precise release almost entirely... MARKER bindings are equipped with a moveable AFD (anti friction device) supporting a precise release almost entirely unhindered by dirt, snow and ice! The all new Duke PT 12 (DIN 4-12) also combines the performance of a Jester with comfortable uphill properties of a pin binding. 2021 Marker Duke PT 16 Ski Bindings MARKER SKU: 21-765OU1 (No reviews yet) Write a Review ... 2021 Marker Duke PT 12 Ski Bindings. I had the original Duke's for years and they were great. Looks like a pretty snazzy design for a toe piece. Keen eye, Christopher! Marker Duke PT Review + SHIFT Comparison - Powder7 Lift Line SE, Have a pair of Rustler 10 mounted with a Look SPX and are planning to get the Duke PT for the skis. We have quite a bit of Duke info here on WildSnow.com. The bindingâs heel piece looks similar to the KingPin binding but, like the SHIFT, will only offer a 10-degree climbing aid. Marker Duke PT 16 Freetour Ski Bindings Black/Gunmetal. Have fun! Save 300 g per foot for the uphill. According to Marker, the two models weigh in at 1,280 grams (Duke PT 16) and 1,090 grams (Duke PT 12) in downhill mode, and 280 grams less in uphill mode if the toe housing is removed. Not like the Pivot 14 having less release range than the Pivot 18. Good on your Marker! The CAST touring system, which utilizes the Look Pivot 18, realistically is probably the closest competitor in this sense. 4-point self locking toe part. I like the Shift as more of a 50/50 binding, at least as far as the current market is concerned, the Shift used to be the 80/20 before the PT in my mind, certainly as far as tech (non-frame) bindings go. Touring Boots. SE, Your email address will not be published. I don't think there'll be interference, but again, the worst it's going to be off is a hole width. $263.99. Removing the toe pieces saves you about 1 pound 5 ounces for the pair, but it still canât match the Salomon in this department. Hi Geoff! To do so, you flip the alpine toe piece up and off the concealed toe pins. Height-adjustable gliding plate to be compatible with alpine (ISO 5355), touring (ISO 9523) and GripWalk soles. I've personally seen people on the mountain have these issues when dropping rocks as well. Also as a ⦠In other words, the Duke PT 16 isnât going to be quite as efficient as the Shift when ascending, but thatâs okay. 2021 Marker XComp 16 B85 Ski Bindings. You can either leave the alpine toe attached, or remove it completely for the ⦠If the Shift made frame bindings outdated, the arrival of another solid option basically makes them obsolete entirely. Kör idag på Marker Griffon 13ID, DIN 8-9.5, beroende på tid på året och underlag (73kg, 187 cm). For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser. I ski aggressively, but it's not as if I'm launching off cliffs. GripWalk Adult Have fun! The Shift was a hugely innovative binding that basically changed the way we think about touring equipment, and this Duke PT is basically just expanding that category. I ski the camox free bird 188s and I am deciding between the shift and the duke PT 16s. Similar, but the holes are further apart. Convertible toe: $719.99. To save swing weight the upper jaw part can be taken off and stored in the backpack. $69.95. Can it be used “Kingpin style” for the downhill with the pin toe only? How does it compare with the Kingpin if that is possible? The Hollow Linkage Heel was designed to optimize retention for all common types of alpine and touring soles. When you’re ready to descend, you simply flip that lever forward again and the heel piece is ready. When Iâm switching between setups with much lighter tech bindings and go to the Duke PT, its extra weight is definitely noticeable. 6'' 195lbs. The heel hole pattern appears to be the same, but the toe pattern is different. Main difference is the Baron max DIN setting is 12, meaning DIN 11 is probably the highest practical setting. I've been using Kingpin bindings for awhile and, besides a bit of a learning curve getting a toe line up, I've been happy with both ascending and descending. Lock & Walk Brake Including neutral walking mode and 10° climbing aid . If you’re ever skied a Marker Griffon, or really the Jester is the more accurate comparison, you already know how well those bindings perform. The alpine touring segment is growing, and the products are improving at a similarly rapid pace. I'm 6' 200lbs, ski pretty flat, no jumps other than small 10' hits once in a while. At the very worst, you're only going to be about a hole width off, I don't think you need to separate by a centimeter. More tech in the PT 16? You can essentially draw a spectrum of performance that goes something like Kingpin, Shift, Duke PT with one end leaning more towards efficient ascending and the other leaning more towards power and descending performance. Marker has answered the call with the innovative new Marker Duke PT 12 Alpine Touring Ski Bindings. I got perhaps the first Duke PT 16 retail-sold worldwide this week, as I live in UK but found a German outlet that works with Marker, Blizzard and others on their athlete testing. I was ready to write this one off due to the weight. I think it's better to get a separate setup. Photo courtesy of Marker. In the end, we think aggressive riders with big-mountain ambitions may prefer the Duke PT, but the lighter and more streamlined Shift remains the gold standard for most skiers. You have the option of either removing the toe piece entirely or leaving it in a locked position folded forward on the ski. Take care! I'm in a very similar situation, trying to find a good mix of hybrid gear to start out with, 5'10 160, I feel like the dukes could be a good option, but i would need new boots, do you think for a first time touring set up that it is worth the extra investment for a proper hybrid boot and a hybrid binding over just sticking with classic alpine boots and a frame binding. The most innovative part of this new Duke PT is the toe piece. But maybe it's time though to invest in a purely lift service set up. Because from what I've heard the Shifts have a lot of pre-release issues. I wonder. We have a new binding option in the non-frame touring binding world, and another that’s designed to be much stronger than your typical tech-fit bindings. The heel is the latest generation of lightweight Hollow Linkage heels. Frame bindings have traditionally been the choice of skiers who want to have versatility between the resort and backcountry, and also for those who want the strongest possible binding for hitting backcountry jumps, big cliffs, etc. This is unusual as often just the upper DIN range is available then a season or so later the lower DIN range is released. I don't see more, but slightly less. Then you can be sure that some day someone is going to stop for a snack and one of the toe pieces is going to fall out unnoticed and get buried in the snow, when they get to the top it is going to really ruin their day. These brakes are designed for the Marker DUKE PT 12 & Marker DUKE PT 16 only!! RIDEBRAIN GEAR CHECK. I think the 80% in bounds puts you in the Duke PT category. For great Royal Family downhill performance and release function combined with pin-technology for strong uphill... For great Royal Family downhill performance and release function combined with pin-technology for strong uphill performance; DIN 6 â 16 I'm an older, lifelong skier an ski ~50 days per season . ... Duke PT 16 Alpine Touring Ski Bindings - 2020/2021. The low height of 24 mm allows for direct power transmission and fast edge changes. The same is true about the heel piece. Check it out! Tim, I am no way biassed to one company or another, but have owned the Shift for a season and it is brilliant at what it does. 2022 Rossignol Experience 86 Ti Ski Review, 2021 Volkl Blaze 106 Men's and Women's Ski Review, 2022 Elan Ripstick 96 Black Edition Ski Review. SE. No toe wiggle and a solid heal locking mechanism - one that instils confidence. We tested the Duke EPF 16, but Marker has upped their game this year for those aggressive skiers who just need a higher DIN setting. These skis will be my one and done setup...any advice? 300mm BSL, HI C! The hollow axle saves on weight and maximizes the torsional stiffness. This year's 2021 Marker Squire 11.0 ID Ski Bindings are the same as last year. Big difference is where the weight sits. I think given the 60% resort use, the Duke 16 is a good choice. ... Marker. Adult, standard Alpine Inter Pivot 3 Freeride Heel The newest generation; DIN 6-16 (Duke PT 16 only) Magnesium parts Magnesium heel housing for superior stability & light weight (Duke PT 16 only) Quick view. Duke PT 16 vs PT 12, the 12 is plenty for 95% of skiers, 100% of the time. We’re pleased to review the all-new Marker Duke PT. On those days when you might want to do a big hike it is a shame to have to carry that extra weight. For walking mode the upper part is simply unlocked and tilted forward, uncovering the pin binding. Marker Duke PT 16 Markerâs Duke PT is new for this year, and it arrives with a bang.The Duke PT is designed to replace both your inbounds bindings and your touring bindings. TOE PIECE As for our firstlook, as many of you know the Marker Baron backcountry skiing binding is quite similar to Duke in appearance, and is exactly the same in function. My question was answered at the top, can these be skied in pin mode and the answer no is really disappointing and I think they have missed a trick here. If you’re the type of skier who is planning on spending a lot of time at the resort on your AT skis, this might be the best choice for you. Looking at the difference between the PT 16 and 12, besides the DIN range, did you mean to say that the 12 comes with the Inter Pivot 3 heel, but the 16 does not? Talk to a Skier: For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser. Show favorites. An absolute highlight is the innovative Ride & Hike toe. When ascending, it feels smooth and efficient. I wouldn't put it over a standard downhill binding--too many moving parts, but tons of versatility, that's for sure! The forward pressure indicator on the back of most Marker Bindings (Squire, Griffon, Jester, Jester Pro, Comp 16 etc) is the silver screw on the back of the black heel piece housing. $899.99 Add to Cart. And what would we do if we discovered at the top of the climb that we had lost or forgotten the toe piece? Duke PT over a standard downhill binding? Any input in how the SPX hole pattern will interfer with the Duke PTs? The Duke PT 16âs heel piece does not move along the ski like the Marker Kingpin since the pins on the Duke PTâs tech toe are forward enough on the ski that your boot heel wonât engage the Duke PTâs heel piece in tour mode. Looks to be the opposite — the 16 does, and the 12 does not. this is one of two touring setups in my quiver, and is Heavy Duty.. din sets at 11.5 6'4 @ 200lbs. So, how does it feel when you’re skiing? The pins are too far forward to engage the heel. See the Marker Duke PT 16 6. This will be my first AT setup and I will hope to use it around 75/25 at first with the intention of slowly going to 50/50 inbound/skin track. The very robust construction is best suited for the most strenuous of requirements. Easy to... Height-adjustable gliding plate to be compatible with alpine (ISO 5355), touring (ISO 9523) and GripWalk soles. The SPX has a pretty wide heel spread, so that shouldn't interfere, and the toe of the PT is narrow. At first glance, it looks robust and strong, and it is. To save swing weight the upper jaw part can be taken off and stored in the backpack. What I have read about this binding tells me that you don't get more, but carry a good bit more weight and have to try and get those toe pieces to fit together when covered in snow/ice, and so why would you? Like the Shift, it converts between a pin-tech binding for the uphill and an alpine-style, DIN certified binding for the downhill. For the heel piece, all you have to do is flip a little lever on the brake, step down hard, and it locks the brake up for touring. Easy to adjust: pozi screw at the front to adjust height of gliding plate. After a few thousand steps uphill you'll feel the difference... Great review. What's $150, anyway? In ski mode, the all-new toe piece inspires great confidence by practically swallowing the front of any ski boot. Mounted the Dukes to a Blizzard Rustler 10, and swapped out its Pivot 18 to the Bonafide 97 I also recently picked up from the same retailer. It would seem that the Duke PT 12 would be a no brainer, but to pick-up on an earlier thread, do I need the extra horsepower, fussiness and to a lesser degree weight? This binding is for skiers who are willing to carry some extra weight for the confidence and performance it provides for the descent, and that’s where this binding really shines. Much like the Rocky movies the binding manufacturers have delivered heavy blows to each other last couple of years. The Duke PT is designed for exactly the same application, but it’s far, far better than any frame binding. JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. SE. Thank you. $329.99 Previous Next. Hi, this was a useful review. Hey great review, We made that change--knew it, just typed it wrong! ...which means quoting the weight without the toe piece is irrelevant, don't you think? $600.00 (0) 0 reviews. Functionally, the Duke PT 16âs heel piece is extremely similar to the heel piece on the Marker Jester. In other words, the Duke PT 16 isn’t going to be quite as efficient as the Shift when ascending, but that’s okay. I don't think you're the first nor the last to bring up this tech trait. Thus, the Duke PT accomplishes a reasonably light uphill weight. Hi Patrick! Marker c.a.s.t their hat into the ring; named after the legendary Duke binding the new DUKE PT 12 ski binding offers full alpine performance with pin toe tech for the up. Let’s consider the other popular touring binding from Marker, the Kingpin. That’s for a single binding, or ½ a pair. You get excellent power transmission and elastic travel out of it. Marker Duke EPF: dukeEPF_paper_template_R1: Marker Duke, Baron, F10, F12: duke_paper_template_R3: Salomon Guardian, Atomic Tracker: guardian_paper_template_R2: Tyrolia Adrenalin: adrenalin_paper_template_R1: Alpine Bindings: Salomon (all models) salomon_paper_template_R6: Look Pivot (P), Rossignol FKS, FKX (turntable heel) ⦠Hejsan, ska köpa mig ett par Marker Duke PT. No one is going to buy this binding for randonnee racing. It's tough to make that initial investment, but climbing is so much easier on a tech binding. Alpine Touring: Marker Duke EPF 16 vs Tyrolia Adrenaline 13 I am looking for a burly alpine touring binding to mount on my Faction CT 3.0s (fat park ski, 112mm) and have narrowed down my search to these two options. Including neutral walking mode and 10° climbing aid, Toe part locks itself at 4 different points automatically when stepping into the binding. We’re in a really good spot in the AT world right now. The world would be a pretty boring place if everything was the same. Thanks to Sole.ID all Duke PT are compatible to alpine, touring and GripWalk boots. Good to hear, but it probably depends on what type of skier you are. Hi Zach! When we do, you can be sure there’s a good reason. Thanks. The world would be a pretty boring place if everything was the same. While the DIN range is more suitable for more skiers than the PT 16, the PT 12 has all the performance most humans need on the hill for an uphill friendly fully downhill capable binding. I'm 5' 9" 165 lbs. What’s nice about the Duke PT 16 is that it’s much, much more efficient than the frame bindings it’s replacing, and it’s very strong overall. Have fun! I'm thinking of putting either the Shift or Duke PT 12 on a pair of Rustler 10's. The new Marker Duke PT 16 is a touring binding optimized for the best downhill experience possible. SE. The Duke PT 16 has a 6-16 DIN range; the Duke PT 12 has a 4-12 DIN range. Seems like the shifts can be dialed in to not do this (Cody Townsend uses them all the time) but are pretty difficult to get there, and for someone without a team of professionals it seems like a lot of bother. That’s not its intention. You’re securely locked in place with little to no wiggle or movement whatsoever. For downhill mode the front jaw section is clicked back onto the base plate being quadruple secured by the Auto Quad Lock technology. Looking for Some Guidance? Marker c.a.s.t their hat into the ring; named after the legendary Duke binding the new DUKE PT 16 ski binding offers full alpine performance with pin toe tech for the up. Individual adjustment of the AFD to the area of application enhance optimized functionality - for racing, for childrenâs bindings or on ski tours. No, you have to put the alpine toe back on in order to click into the heel piece. Interesting review. After using some guerrilla marketing tactics for the last few weeks, Marker finally announced a brand-new binding that seems to offer the same capability as the Shift. In your pack vs. on your skis/ legs. Certainly feels more like an alpine binding when you click in! I am 60% (resort/inbounds) 40% (touring). It’s been over 2 years since we reviewed the new Salomon (Atomic, Armada) Shift binding. The back part is moveable 60 mm back and forth. Is the drill hole pattern the same as Jester/Griffon? They are calling it the Duke PT. It’s important to note that the Duke PT 16 comes in at 1,280 g with the toe attached and 1,000 g with it removed. Save 7% '21 Marker The Squire 11 ID Freeride/Freestyle Ski Bindings. At first glance, it looks kind of like a Marker Jester with a lever sticking out of its nose. It’s not often that we review a binding on SkiEssentials.com. The F12's are built sturdy and you can feel it ⦠The Duke PT 12 is more comparable at 850 g without the alpine toe piece attached, but you donât get the Inter Pivot 3 heel on the 12 version. They also run another $150. The Shift certainly won’t go away, because it offers a different level of performance. The Marker Tour F12 Alpine Touring Binding brings a lot of its design from the ultra sturdy Marker Duke and this shows, the F12 is super beefy. In the photo above you can see the screw is flush with the black binding housing while the boot is clicked in, indicating that the foward pressure is set properly. Undrar dock om man ska satsa på 12 eller 16 varianten. I've always been a one ski does all skier. I understand the reasons and it would be hard to achieve but this has to be the next step so I don't think we are there yet with the optimum do everything binding. Marker Duke PT 16 The Marker Duke PT 16 ski binding. The Marker Duke PT 16 and Duke PT 12 let you tour uphill in a âpinâ / âtechâ toe piece. It’s lighter, and it feels like more of a blend of alpine and AT performance. Required fields are marked *. The Shift, which is the most obvious competitor, comes in a little lighter at 860 g. The Duke PT 12 is more comparable at 850 g without the alpine toe piece attached, but you don’t get the Inter Pivot 3 heel on the 12 version. More economical and there's plenty of skis/bindings out there that work in most snow conditions here in the East. Marker Bindings photo. Their new offering, the Duke Pro EPF 18, has a DIN range of 8 to 18. For walking mode the upper part is simply unlocked and tilted forward, uncovering the pin binding. I also had the Duke 16s mounted on Rustler 10's. I do, however, acknowledge that I HAVE NOT tried them. This review follows the same trend. Thoughts? we reviewed the new Salomon (Atomic, Armada) Shift binding. I wonder too, Tim! Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. As someone who does big mountain, I don't want any trust issues with my bindings. It will likely become the go-to binding for skiers looking for the highest level of alpine performance, while still retaining touring capabilities. Hi Charlie! For the toe, you simply line it back up, push down gently on two metal tabs, then flip it back towards the heel and it locks into place.
How Many Episodes Of Spongebob Are There, The Fourth State Of Matter Pdf, Mazda O Subaru, Fallout 76 Whitespring Resort Hand Scanner, Dallas Stars Zoom Background, How To Install Cooktop On Granite Countertop, Cobalt Hydroxide Msds, Sprouts Dutch-process Cocoa Powder, Architectural Plaster Mouldings, Text To Pdf App, Remote Control Car Online,
